Bitcoin Treasury Advisory · newmacro.ca
Bitcoin treasury strategy for Canadian companies. Independent advice your board and your auditors can stand behind.
New Macro is a specialist advisory firm focused exclusively on bitcoin executive education and treasury strategy for Canadian companies — from board-level education to implementation, built for the Canadian regulatory environment.
built with your auditors
and reporting framework
and education curriculum
Lost ground each year on $5M in long-term reserves
Canada's broad money supply grows roughly 7% a year. A GIC ladder returns roughly 2.8% after corporate tax. Measured against money-supply growth, that's a −4.2% real return — about $210K a year on $5M, compounding every year.
Why benchmark against the money supply, not CPI? CPI prices a consumption basket. Reserves held across decades compete with every new dollar created — and even against CPI, the after-tax return on a GIC ladder is roughly break-even.
What we do
01
Executive Education
A three-session program, delivered live in person or by video, that takes your board from first principles to a defensible decision — tailored to your company and the Canadian environment.
- The Macro Case — why bitcoin, why now
- The Fiduciary Playbook — approving it defensibly
- CFO & Audit Deep-Dive — IFRS, custody, objections
- Tailored to your board and finance team
02
Treasury Assessment
A written assessment of your readiness to hold bitcoin — liquidity analysis, allocation sizing, accounting and tax treatment, and a clear recommendation your board can act on.
- Liquidity and excess-cash analysis
- Allocation framework and scenarios
- IFRS/ASPE accounting and CRA tax treatment
- Risk, custody, and policy framework
- Governance and disclosure strategy
- Implementation roadmap and timeline
03
Implementation
End-to-end execution from board approval to first acquisition — custody, brokerage, controls, policies, and the accounting setup, with your finance team trained to run it.
- Custodian and OTC desk selection
- Treasury Reserve and Trading policies
- Internal controls and multi-sig custody
- Accounting, tax tracking, and reporting
- First acquisition and team training
The macro case
There are three ways out of a debt problem. Governments choose the same one every time.
In How Countries Go Broke (2025), Ray Dalio applies his Big Debt Cycle framework to the current US fiscal position: structural deficits, interest costs compounding on interest, and more Treasury supply than the world has appetite to absorb. When debts grow faster than the income that services them, only three exits exist — austerity, restructuring, or printing. The first two are politically punishing; the third has diffuse, delayed costs. Across five hundred years of cases, printing is chosen every time.
This is not a hyperinflation forecast. It is the observation that currency debasement relative to hard assets is the structural release valve for excess sovereign debt — the base case of the regime, not a tail risk.
In this regime, cash and nominal bonds are quietly the riskiest "safe" assets: they lose purchasing power by design, slowly enough that it never shows on a variance report.
Dalio supplies the diagnosis and prescribes hard assets. The treasury conclusion is ours: among hard assets, bitcoin is uniquely suited to a corporate balance sheet — and at 1–5% of excess reserves, sized so the downside is capped while the offset is meaningful.
Framework: Ray Dalio, How Countries Go Broke (2025) and Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order (2021). The bitcoin conclusion is New Macro's independent analysis, not Dalio's recommendation.
Net interest on US federal debt held broadly flat for two decades, then tripled in five years — from ~$345B (FY2020) to ~$970B (FY2025). Source: US Treasury / Congressional Budget Office. Figures nominal, rounded.
What an engagement delivers
Every mandate runs on the same six-pillar framework — governance, risk management, accounting & tax, disclosure, execution architecture, and policy. Nothing is improvised: each engagement is documented, aligned with your own auditors, and built to stand up to review. The full detail belongs on a call; the summary below shows what you take away.
Illustrative engagement
A privately held B2B SaaS company with idle reserves — what a mandate looks like.
For a company in this position — strong cash, predictable subscription revenue, no near-term capital needs — an engagement runs from board education through a written assessment to full implementation: qualified custody with segregated multi-signature storage, an OTC settlement relationship, the complete policy and controls stack, and a finance team trained to run quarterly reporting and fair-value measurement on its own. The allocation itself is staged: an initial position of roughly $300K — 5% of excess reserves — with board-approved escalation gates scaling toward $1.25M over 24 months as custody, reporting, and board comfort mature. Accounting treatment is settled with the company's auditors before the first purchase.
Illustrative example representative of a typical New Macro mandate. Figures are rounded and the profile is composite; it does not identify any specific client and discloses no confidential information.
Representative deliverables
- Treasury Reserve Policy
- Bitcoin Trading Policy
- Authorization matrix & approval procedures
- Accounting procedures manual
- Impairment-testing workbook
- Tax cost-basis tracking (specific-identification)
- Chart-of-accounts updates & journal templates
- Quarterly reporting templates
- Operations manual for ongoing management
- Finance-team training, recorded
- Board presentation on the decision & rollout
- 90-day post-implementation support
Who you'll work with
Justin Wallis
Founder ·
New Macro Treasury Consulting
Justin's background spans nearly two decades across global markets and professional services — financial management at EY, six years in ANZ's Global Markets division supporting institutional FX trading and operations, and an AFMA-accredited dealing desk executing futures and options on the major global exchanges. He founded New Macro to bring that discipline — controls, risk, and reporting built to stand up to scrutiny — to bitcoin treasury strategy for Canadian companies. Every engagement is led by Justin directly, and works alongside your existing legal, tax, and audit advisors rather than around them.
Connect on LinkedInFrequently asked questions
Volatility is real, but it needs to be weighed against the alternative it's measured against: the slow, certain erosion of purchasing power on long-term reserves left in cash-equivalents. Volatility is the price of an asymmetric, scarce asset — and over a multi-year horizon it has historically compressed.
Most treasury implementations start with 1–5% of excess reserves, which limits downside exposure while providing meaningful upside participation. The question isn't whether bitcoin is volatile — it is. The question is whether a measured allocation makes sense for the store-of-value portion of your reserves.
Bitcoin doesn't fit neatly into either Canadian framework, so the treatment is built by analogy. Under IFRS (public companies), it's an intangible asset under IAS 38 — carried at cost with impairment testing, or at revalued amount through OCI if the revaluation model is elected. Under ASPE (most private companies), it's also an intangible, but at cost less impairment only, with no revaluation option — so gains surface on disposal rather than each reporting period.
The right treatment depends on the standard you report under, your business model, and your intended holding period. We work with your auditors to document a defensible, audit-ready position from the outset.
U.S. companies report under U.S. GAAP, where ASU 2023-08 now carries bitcoin at fair value with gains and losses running through net income every period. Canadian companies report under IFRS (public) or ASPE (most private), where bitcoin is an intangible — gains aren't marked through earnings each period. They're recognised on disposal under the cost model, or routed to equity through OCI under the IFRS revaluation model, rather than lifting reported profit the way U.S. GAAP now requires. The measurement, disclosure, and tax implications are materially different, so a U.S. template doesn't map cleanly onto a Canadian balance sheet. We build the treatment to the standard you actually report under, plus CRA guidance, and document it with your auditors.
CRA treats cryptocurrency as a commodity. Gains and losses are generally business income (fully taxable) or capital gains (50% inclusion rate), depending on the nature and frequency of transactions and the company's intent.
A company holding bitcoin as a long-term treasury reserve is more likely to be characterised as capital — but this is fact-specific and must be documented carefully at the outset. Purchasing bitcoin is not a taxable event; tax is triggered on disposition.
An ETF gives you price exposure, but you don't own bitcoin — you own units of a fund that holds it, with ongoing management fees and a custodian you don't control. For a treasury reserve asset, that distinction matters.
We help companies hold real bitcoin in institutional custody — segregated, multi-signature, and held in your company's name. You own the asset directly, with no management fees eroding the position and no fund structure between you and your reserves. We handle custodian selection, controls, and the accounting so it's audit-ready from day one.
New Macro provides education, treasury strategy frameworks, and implementation support — not personalised investment advice in the securities law sense. We do not manage client funds or execute transactions on your behalf. Our work is analogous to a treasury management consultant or CFO advisory firm, working alongside your existing legal, tax, and audit advisors.
Treasury calculator
The figures below model an allocation from long-term reserves — not operating cash. Projections use the Bitcoin Power Law, an empirical model of price as a function of time. Two lines matter: the floor — the support band price has held above through every cycle since 2009, including the current drawdown — and the trend, the model's fair-value line, which currently sits above the market price.
If you allocate today
Projected to ~
Power law methodology — read this part
The Power Law models bitcoin's price as a function of time since the 2009 genesis block, originally described by physicist Giovanni Santostasi. It is an empirical fit, not a guarantee — and we present it candidly: the model's cycle-peak projections for early 2026 overshot, and price currently trades below the fair-value trend line. What has held, through every cycle since 2009, including the current drawdown, is the floor — the lower support band. The Floor scenario above uses that band; the Trend scenario uses the fair-value regression.
This calculator is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. All projections are based on historical models and do not guarantee future results. Cryptocurrency carries significant risk. New Macro Treasury Consulting Inc. is not a registered investment advisor.
Worth 30 minutes
to explore?
An honest conversation about fit. We'll tell you whether there's a case to make to your board — and what that case looks like. No obligation, no pitch deck.